Banking Cartels, Central Banking Cartels, Cabals, Juntas
- Lafyva
- May 18, 2019
- 56 min read
Updated: May 25
“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and it's issuance.”
― James Madison
“The Jews are specialized for a parasitical existence upon other nations” (Pearson, 1884, p. 209)
The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion was first published in an 1864 French book Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu or the Politics of Machiavelli in the Nineteenth Century by a Contemporary. By the 1890’s Russian Professor Sergei Nilus had published the Protocols... in The Great Within the Small: The Coming Anti-Christ. Nilus was arrested and tortured and the Protocols... were suppressed for many more decades. The Protocols... were a manifesto written by a secret society that claimed itself superior to the rest of mankind, using the Hebrew word goyim (cattle) to refer to the masses.
Henderson, Dean. Big Oil & Their Bankers In the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror Network . Dean Henderson. Kindle Edition.
Public Significance Statement
Ashkenazi Jews exhibit high levels of general intelligence. The hypothesis that
differences in general intelligence between Jews and Catholics and Lutherans is
partially mediated by polygenic scores for educational attainment was tested. The
results support the hypothesized partial mediation.
Given the recent availability of high-quality PGS on educational attainment and related cognitive phenotypes from large samples (Lee et al., 2018), some of which contain Jews, it should be possible to carry out a genetically informed study on the etiology of the group difference in GCA and educational attainment between Jews and non-Jewish Caucasians of other religious denominations (Catholic and Protestant). The comparison of these two groups is desirable because of the following: (a) evolutionary theories of high Jewish ability have emphasized a role for intergroup competition and niche provisioning between these two groups in particular (Cochran et al., 2006; MacDonald, 1994,1998); and (b) population differences studies using PGS are potentially sensitive to linkage decay, which results from recombination randomizing the associations between alleles on chromosomes over time (Bush & Moore, 2012). This is problematic when the single-nucleotide polymorphisms are noncausal variants that are flagged by the genome-wide association study (GWAS) procedure because they happen to be in consistent linkage phase with the causal variants (Zanetti & Weale, 2016). This problem reduces the utility of PGS when used for populations relatively distant to the training sample (Li & Keating, 2014; cf. Piffer, 2015). Ashkenazi Jews and non-Jewish Caucasians have been found exhibit relatively low levels of genetic differentiation. Tian et al. (2008) found that Ashkenazi Jews exhibited FST values ranging from .0040 when compared with Italians to .0144 when compared with Basque (across eight Caucasian populations, the unweighted FST average is .009). This means that Ashkenazi Jews exhibit little genetic differentiation, relative to non-Jewish Caucasians (FST values ranging from 0 to .05 correspond to little genetic differentiation; Hartl & Clark, 1989). Values this low also correspond to negligible amounts of prospective linkage decay because this parameter has been found to scale quite strongly with FST (Scutari, Mackay, & Balding, 2016). To test the polygenic selection theory, a large sample of predominantly Caucasian individuals of European descent from the United States, which also contains Jews will be utilized in a mediation analysis. We first examine the group difference between Jews and non-Jews belonging to two large Christian denominations on PGS and indices of GCA and, second, test examines the degree to which a PGS capturing phenotypic variance in educational attainment, IQ, and self-reported mathematical aptitude (POLYMTAG), mediates the group difference. Full mediation is not expected for two reasons. First, the PGS used does not account for all of the variance in the phenotypes of interest (5–10%; Lee et al., 2018) and is thus a rather noisy estimate of the genetic potential. Second, there may also be contributions stemming from cultural (i.e., environment) causes and additional nonadditive genetic causes not captured by the PGS (which captures additive effects only), such as the heterozygote advantage for certain carriers of sphingolipid disorders posited by Cochran et al. (2006). Some indication of polygenic mediation is nevertheless what would be expected if polygenic selection has played a role in shaping the group differences with respect to measures of cognitive ability.
Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average IQ of any ethnic group for which there are
reliable data. They score 0.75 to 1.0 standard deviations above the general European
average, corresponding to an IQ 112-115.
Homoplasmy and Heteroplasmy
Normally an individual contains only one type of mtDNA – this is termed homoplasmy. Mutations will inevitably occur within some of the thousands of copies of mtDNA within a cell and if these mutated copies of the genome were passed on to future generations, a mixture of different mtDNA genomes could occur. The process that maintains homoplasmy as the norm is not precisely understood but at some point a genetic bottleneck occurs before the formation of a mature oocyte (Marchington et al., 1998). The bottleneck allows only a few mtDNA molecules to pass into the oocyte during its formation (Chinnery et al., 2000; Sekiguchi et al., 2003), thereby reducing the possibility of passing on a mixture of wild type and mutant genomes.
JUDAISM AND INTEREST
"It is not possible to neglect the role of the Jews in either the settlement, or the Revolution, of the United States of America. As Sombart has remarked "what we call Americanism is nothing else.than the Jewish spirit distilled."74 One cannot be too sure whether the expression of Sombart would not be closer to reality if it assumed a reverse posture to the effect that the Jewish spirit is nothing else than the Americanism distilled."
"We have in the house of Rothschild, in the 19th Century, an example of high finance controlling the destinies of more than one country, of credit operations ramifying in the fields of financing wars, economic colonization of the vanquished states, besides supporting industrial and technological development. They, of course, represent the culminating point of this variety offending as the constitutional development in Europe made public credit less dependent or royal whims, and therefore less risky and more attractive for the participation of Christian Banks."
The Rothschild in England supported the British against Napoleon and subsequently advanced credit for the consolidation of impoverished continental states.66 The London Rothschilds presented a plan for British participation in the financing of the construction of railroads in East European countries. The Ministry of Finance agreed and in five years between 1811 and 1816, more than 42 million pounds were advanced by the British Ministry of Finance to the continental countries, more than half of this amount was arranged by the Rothschilds.67 During the first quarter of the 19th Century this banking house arranged loans for many countries including Prussia, Russia, Austria and Brazil.
The Rothschilds were not established in Paris till 1817, well after the defeat of Napolean and therefore did not have the double privilege of supporting both sides simultaneously. So they did the next best thing and handled the loan of impoverished France so well in 1823 that they earned a monopoly on Government bonds which they retained till 1870. Between 1841 and 1847 they arranged for the French Government loans of above 800 million franc?s. They also shared in the construction of French rail road and controlled a large part of them till 1940.68 They also provided many loans for the Czarist Government.
In effect, this creation of paper claims greater than the reserves available means that bankers were creating money out of nothing. The same thing could be done in another way, not by note-issuing banks but by deposit banks. Deposit bankers discovered that orders and checks drawn against deposits by depositors and given to third persons were often not cashed by the latter but were deposited to their own accounts. Thus there were no actual movements of funds, and payments were made simply by bookkeeping transactions on the accounts. Accordingly, it was necessary for the banker to keep on hand in actual money (gold, certificates, and notes) no more than the fraction of deposits likely to be drawn upon and cashed; the rest could be used for loans, and if these loans were made by creating a deposit for the borrower, who in turn would draw checks upon it rather than withdraw it in money, such “created deposits” or loans could also be covered adequately by retaining reserves to only a fraction of their value. Such created deposits also were a creation of money out of nothing, although bankers usually refused to express their actions, either note issuing or deposit lending, in these terms. William Paterson, however, on obtaining the charter of the Bank of England in 1694, to use the moneys he had won in privateering, said, “The Bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.” This was repeated by Sir Edward Holden, founder of the Midland Bank, on December 18, 1907, and is, of course, generally admitted today. This organizational structure for creating means of payment out of nothing, which we call credit, was not invented by England but was developed by her to become one of her chief weapons in the victory over Napoleon in 1815. The emperor, as the last great mercantilist, could not see money in any but concrete terms, and was convinced that his efforts to fight wars on the basis of “sound money,’’ by avoiding the creation of credit, would ultimately win him a victory by bankrupting England. He was wrong, although the lesson has had to be relearned by modern financiers in the twentieth century. Britain’s victory over Napoleon was also helped by two economic innovations: the Agricultural Revolution, which was well established there in 1720, and the Industrial Revolution, which was equally well established there by 1776, when Watt patented his steam engine. The Industrial Revolution, like the Credit Revolution, has been much misunderstood, both at the time and since. This is unfortunate, as each of these has great significance, both to advanced and to underdeveloped countries, in the twentieth century. The Industrial Revolution was accompanied by a number of incidental features, such as growth of cities through the factory system, the rapid growth of an unskilled labor supply (the proletariat), the reduction of labor to the status of a commodity in the competitive market, and the shifting of ownership of tools and equipment from laborers to a new social class of entrepreneurs. None of these constituted the essential feature of industrialism, which was, in fact, the application of nonliving power to the productive process. This application, symbolized in the steam engine and the water wheel, in the long run served to reduce or eliminate the relative significance of unskilled labor and the use of human or animal energy in the productive process (automation) and to disperse the productive process from cities, but did so, throughout, by intensifying the vital feature of the system, the use of energy from sources other than living bodies.
Quigley, Carroll. Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time (pp. 65-66). GSG & Associates Publishers. Kindle Edition.
The Rothschild family combined with the Dutch House of Orange to found Bank of Amsterdam in the early 1600’s as the world’s first central bank. Prince William of Orange married into the English House of Windsor, taking King James II’s daughter Mary as his bride. The Orange Order Brotherhood, which has recently fomented Northern Ireland Protestant violence, put William III on the English throne where he ruled both Holland and Britain. In 1694 William III teamed up with the Rothschilds to launch the Bank of England.
Henderson, Dean. Big Oil & Their Bankers In the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror Network (p. 307). Dean Henderson. Kindle Edition.
CHAPTER 7
INSIDE ACCOUNTS OF THE HORRORS OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
All those who had done the work of the secret societies and their henchmen trying to seize France were later executed, some horribly, and with the utmost cruelty, including Danton and Robespierre, one imagines, to silence them lest they were ever tempted to reveal whom the persons behind the revolution were. Murder, then as now, was the favorite weapon employed against those who sought to thwart the will of the "300." Lord Acton, writing in his Essay on the French Revolution made this observation: The appalling thing is not the tumult but the design. Through all the fire and smoke we perceive the evidence of a calculating organization. The managers remain studiously concealed and masked, but there is no doubt about their presence from the first. We shall come to the Russian-Japanese conflict in 1904, and who set it up, financed it and what their reasons were, but for now, in passing, we shall quote what the Editor of the New York Evening Post said on December 9, 1924: Somewhere behind the fog-bank of propaganda, sinister unseen hands are seeking to destroy the 38 Dr. John Coleman peaceful relations between Russia and Japan. Japan does not want war. Certainly America does not want war. Why then, this perennial clamor that Japan is an enemy to be watched, distrusted, armed against, and finally fought? Of all of the historical figures in the past three centuries, none is better known than Napoleon. Yet not much is ever said about how he rose from obscurity to fame. Like most of those "adopted" by the Rothschilds, Napoleon was dirt poor when Talleyrand introduced him to the Rothschilds. He did not have the money to pay the laundry shop bill, and had only one shirt. His uniform had been supplied by Josephine Beauharnais, whom he later married after Count Paul de Barras had cast her off as his mistress. In 1786 Napoleon was a sub-lieutenant, a poor very junior officer without any money, going from door-to-door seeking employment to supplement his pay. It was a time when the people of Europe had grown tired of "Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity." Amschel was disappointed that Weishaupt had made little progress against the Church, particularly, the Catholic Church, and was seeking "new talent." The fire and ardor of the Corsican impressed Amschel enough to set him up with sufficient money to live decently. H. Fischer, in an article seen in the British Museum wrote: "In 1790 Napoleon succeeded by means, even then judged to be unscrupulous in securing his election as second in command of a whole battalion. " How did he do it? Charles MacFarlane, in his work The Life of Napoleon (it used to be in the British Museum where I read it) threw some light on this "astonishing climb to power:" Augustine Robespierre, the younger brother of the terrible Dictator, had become acquainted with The Rothschild Dynasty 39 Bonaparte at the taking of Toulon in 1798. The fact is indisputable that he contracted an intimacy, having all the appearances of warm friendship with Augustine, who was to be fully as pitiless as his elder brother. According to the autobiography of Wolf Tone (Barry 1893) Robespierre was an Illuminist. A nominal Christian, Napoleon soon sensed the hatred for Christianity that burned in the breast of Amschel, and so he resorted to simulation to please his new money supplier. He turned against the Catholic Church. The humiliation of the Pope was a very pleasing prospect to Amschel, and money began to flow into Napoleon's pockets in ever-increasing amounts. Thus is his "stunning rise to power," his "astonishing successes" explained! As we say in modern parlance, the writers and biographers of Napoleon failed to follow the money trail. The failure of Weishaupt to destroy the Catholic Church, the purpose for which he was "constructed" by Amschel was galling, but when Napoleon was brought to his attention, the whole work was shifted to him. The way it was to be accomplished was planned in the Mason lodges in Paris frequented by Talleyrand and in Frankfurt by Amschel. It was Talleyrand who told Napoleon: War is the only way you can destroy the Church. This was acknowledged by H.G. Wells who called the Corsican genius "a wrecker, (of the revolution) hard, competent, capable, possessing initiative," but he failed to mention his financial backer, without whose masses of money, these traits of character would not have availed him much. Like Kerensky, Trotsky, Disraeli, Lloyd George and Bismarck, Amschel took over Napoleon when he was of no importance, and made of him, the most important man in Europe. Although H.G. Wells complained that he did not 40 Dr. John Coleman continue the revolution, this was not the point. When Amschel had Napoleon appointed the First Consul for life by a large margin of votes, the stage was set to ring up the curtain on Europe. As long as he carried out the mission set for him by Amschel, the destruction of the Christian Monarchies and of the Catholic Church, Napoleon bore a charmed life, going from one success to another. A good book I found in the British Museum was by Sidney Dark in which he wrote, How Great Was Napoleon: Napoleon, born without any advantage of wealth or high descent, made himself master of the world before he was 35 and finished his career of unparalleled romantic impossibility when he was 46. This completely overlooks the powers behind Napoleon, Amschel and his millions and the planners inside the Mason lodges of Paris and Frankfurt. On March 9, 1796, Napoleon married Josephina de Beauharnais, a Creole woman with insatiable sexual appetites who had once paid for his uniform. The marriage was arranged by the Rothschilds through Count Paul de Barras who also appointed Napoleon Commander in Chief of the Army in Italy. Josephina was the mistress of de Barras, but tiring of her, he sought to end the relationship, and to avoid her oath to take revenge on him, Count de Barras arranged for her to marry Napoleon, hardly the "romantic" spin put on the occasion by practically every writer on the life and times of Napoleon. Josephine helped de Barras by giving him confidential details imparted to her by her husband, which of course went straight to the Rothschilds. Napoleon's coronation in 1804 was treated with indifference by Amschel, but he became alarmed when the Pope was invited. The Rothschilds were dismayed and angry when Napoleon The Rothschild Dynasty 41 divorced Josephine and married the Arch-Duchess Maria Louisa in 1810. The Rothschild's recognized that henceforth there would be less and less chance to destroy kingdoms and smash the Catholic Church. From 1810 the die was cast against Napoleon and James Rothschild was seconded to the task of ruining their former hero. The full story of the gradual disillusionment of Napoleon, his awakening to the knowledge that he was not fighting for France, but rather for an alien power to further its grip on the nation as a necessary follow-on to the revolution, the role of the Illuminati and the Masons in his career, made him more and more angry. The awakening was slow to come, and painful, but once his mind was opened to the truth, Napoleon began to rebel against his controllers. In his work, History of Napoleon, G. Bussey says that Napoleon changed, lost his fierce desire for war and declared; Thank God I am at peace with the world. The Rothschilds now had no further use for their former tool. They financed and set up a front called A League Against Napoleon. The mentors whom Napoleon had begun to neglect were now turned against him. Karl Rothschild hastened to despoil relations between the Pope and Napoleon, and without the knowledge of Napoleon, ordered the arrest of the Holy Father carried out by General Radet. The Pope reacted with an Excommunication Bill against the Emperor. Napoleon had been trying to win over the Pope. He felt the ground quaking beneath his feet as events, one after another, went against him. An attempt to assassinate him by Illuminati agent Stapps was foiled by the vigilance of General Rapp. The Russian campaign was plagued by supply problems and lack of food. Napoleon did not understand that it was deliberate sabotage of his army. He was forced to order a retreat from Moscow, during which thousands of soldiers dying from wounds and the cold were mercilessly shot to death by Rothschild's agents coming up in the rear. 42 Dr. John Coleman The loss of Christian lives was horrendous. With the failure to win over the Pope, Napoleon became seriously concerned as his confidence ebbed away. He noted this: The Pope could have been won over as additional means of binding together the federated parts of the Empire. I should have had my religious as well as my legislative sessions. My councils would have constituted the representatives of Christianity, and the successor of St. Peter would have been the President. Too late, as Karl Rothschild had already seen to it that such a plan would not succeed. No historian can tell why Napoleon attacked Russia in 1812. Theories abound but none of substance. Alexander I said of the attack: "Napoleon waged war on me in the most odious fashion and has deceived me in the most treacherous manner." For his part, Napoleon told General Gourgaud: / did not want to make war on Russia. Bassano and Champagny [Ministers of Foreign Affairs] persuaded me that the note of Russia was meant as a declaration of war. I really thought that Russia wanted war. What were the real motives of the campaign in Russia? I do not know, possibly the Emperor himself did not know more than I did. The Rothschilds ruined Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo. He was betrayed by Marshal Soult, a man he had befriended, but who was in the pay of the Rothschilds. Napoleon made Soult the Duke of Dalmatia with a salary of millions of francs and appointed him Marshal of the Army. At Waterloo, Soult failed to take and hold Gemappe, an important village to anchor the flank of Napoleon's army. The Rothschild Dynasty 43 Worse yet, Marshal Grouchy who was supposed to provide reinforcements arrived 24 hours too late, even though he heard the guns and knew that the battle had been joined. Of Soult, Napoleon complained bitterly: Soult, my second in command at Waterloo, did not aid me as much as he might have done. . . His staff, in spite of my orders, was not organized. Soult was very easily discouraged. . . Soult was worth nothing. Why during the battle did he not keep order at Gemappe? Worse yet, on the morning of the battle, an enemy inside the Corsican's personal staff put a substance in his breakfast that caused him to suffer a terrible migraine. Such is the power of the Rothschilds and the falsification of history; but for the treachery and treason committed against him, Napoleon would have soundly defeated Blucher and Wellington. Soult served his masters well; they gave him some of the highest offices in France. That he was the father of Bismarck has often been suggested, but never proved. At one time Bismarck's mother was Soult's mistress, as confirmed by Bismarck: Not my talents or capacities made me great, but the fact that my mother was the mistress of Soult, [one of the 300] who all helped me. Bismarck was "made" by the Rothschilds through the Menkens. His father, William, had married a Louise Menken, whom Count Cherep-Spiridovich said was a Jewess. Marshall Soult, who betrayed Napoleon at Waterloo, was a member of the Committee of 300, who occupied the top posts in France until his death. Soult was often in attendance of William Bismarck country residence and was widely believed to be the father of younger Bismarck. It was this "hold" over Bismarck mother that kept young Bismarck under the control of James Rothschild. In 1833, Bismarck was up against tough times and in danger of losing his property. Through Disraeli, James 44 Dr. John Coleman Rothschild befriended the young Bismarck and sought to create his as a "conservative" future leader of Europe. Oscar Arnim, a member of the Reichstag married Bismarck's sister, Malian. Following the marriage Bismarck was totally under the direction of Lionel Rothschild. That Bismarck knew it was clear from a statement made by Walter Rathenau in 1871:To those who insisted upon treating Bismarck as a great political genius, a man of fate, marked, like Napoleon with the seal of a tragic predestination, Bismarck would repeat, that he did not believe in great providential men; that according to his belief, political celebrities owed their reputations, if not to chance, at least to circumstances which they themselves could not have foreseen.
Adam Weishaupt formed the “Order of the Illuminati” in Bavaria on May 1, 1776. The philosophy of Weishaupt’s Illuminism “propose[d] as the end of Illuminism the abolition of property, social authority, and of nationality,”99 and was based primarily on revolution and secrecy as a means to bring about social change. Weishaupt’s goal was the complete and revolutionary restructuring of society, and to this end Weishaupt “felt the need of a powerful secret organization to support him in the conflict with his adversaries and in the execution of his rationalistic schemes along ecclesiastical and political lines.”1010 By 1778, only two years after its creation, Weishaupt was able to secure more then 1000 members for the Illuminati in Bavaria alone, and there were lodges in 12 other countries including France and the United States.1111 In 1784, a messenger was struck by lightning while carrying letters from Weishaupt to other members of the Illuminati. The police authorities confiscated these letters, which resulted in the raid of the homes of several leading members of the Illuminati. Weishaupt’s Order of the Illuminati was declared as subversive to the German government and the leaders of the Illuminati were banished from Germany. After the French Revolution numerous books outlining alleged connections between the French Jacobins and Weishaupt’s Illuminati were produced. These books focused on the many shared members between the Illuminati and the Jacobins, showing that the leaders of the French Revolution were also high ranking members of the Illuminati, according the Illuminati’s records which were confiscated by the Bavarian government. Concern over the influence of the Illuminati during the French Revolution spread all over the world, including America. In a letter to Rev. G.W. Snyder dated October 24, 1798, Former President George Washington States, Reverend sir: It was not my intention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more satisfied of this fact then I am.1212
Millegan, Kris. Fleshing Out Skull & Bones: Investigations into America's Most Powerful Secret Society . Independent Publishers Group. Kindle Edition.
JFK Assassination Records - 2023 Additional Documents Release
As the young Marx put it, earth is man's "anorganic body."
Inorganic chemistry deals with synthesis and behavior of inorganic and organometallic compounds. This field covers chemical compounds that are not carbon-based, which are the subjects of organic chemistry. The distinction between the two disciplines is far from absolute, as there is much overlap in the subdiscipline of organometallic chemistry. It has applications in every aspect of the chemical industry, including catalysis, materials science, pigments, surfactants, coatings, medications, fuels, and agriculture.[1]
This paper concerns Gödel’s conception of the reality of mathematical objects. I distinguish three claims (i), (ii), (iii).
(i) Mathematics describes a non-sensual reality, which exists independently both of the acts and [of] the dispositions of the human mind.
(ii) Mathematical theories are not created by the ego out of nothing.
(iii) Mathematics (or something in mathematics) is independent of the specific properties of the human being.
I argue that Gödel cannot hold such the strong Platonism of (i) after 1954. His position is better described by the two weaker claims, (ii) and (iii). Claims (ii) and (iii) offer two different meanings for the idea of an ‘objectivity’ of mathematics, and philosophers can very well accept one without the other.
Rothschild - Karl Marx - Heinrich Heine
Marx, the French Revolution, and the Spectre of the Bourgeoisie
Marx’s emphasis on the weight of tradition and the importance of false consciousness
continues to make a certain amount of sense in the interpretation
of the French Revolution. In his view revolutionaries at first did not rationally
understand the consequences of their own actions. It is only when the smoke
cleared in the wake of the revolution that a realistic understanding of the significance
of the event emerged. It has recently been suggested that Marx’s notion
of bourgeois revolution must be understood in terms of his conception of the
central role of the state as the forcing house of bourgeois revolutionary transformation.
16 This insight helps to account for the prominence in the revolution
of this socially alienated political language of classical republicanism.
On the other hand, I will argue in opposition both to Maza and Marx that a
sense of the bourgeoisie as a class and of a bourgeois revolution did develop in
the immediate wake of the taking of the Bastille in 1789. In the early politically
and socially tense years of the revolution, I will show, some revolutionaries did
in fact understand the revolution in these political-economic terms. A Marxist
understanding of the bourgeoisie as a class did not emerge. Nor should we
expect it to. But the class conflicts and successive crises of the revolution led
revolutionary leaders to begin to refer to the better-off among the supporters
of the revolution as the bourgeois class. Moreover, the foundations of this class
was understood to be its economic power. Further, I will argue that the decline
of this kind of class-based discourse and its replacement by that of classical
republicanism was not the result simply of the influence of the classical republican
tradition, as Marx would have it. The weight or power of a certain tradition
on consciousness is itself a historic circumstance that needs to be explained.
Rather, the triumph of the ideology of classical republicanism came about in
response to the specific and urgent political and social circumstances generated
by the revolution. In particular, the emergence of a language of class and of
class conflict threatened bourgeois leadership over the revolution.
The Bank of Nova Scotia is the leading gold dealer in the Caribbean and the leading handler of capital flight out of the Caribbean. It is the banker of Noranda, a huge Canadian mining company that is the second largest dealer of gold in the Caribbean. Gold is the preferred currency of drug traffickers and Bank of Nova Scotia Jamaican subsidiary Scotiabank plays a huge role in the Caribbean drug trade. [154] The 200 tons of gold recovered from vaults beneath the World Trade Center in the cleanup effort following the 911 terror attacks belonged to Bank of Nova Scotia.
Henderson, Dean. Big Oil & Their Bankers In the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror Network . Dean Henderson. Kindle Edition.
While Sharjah’s free-trade airport handled contraband, the neighboring UAE emirate of Dubai handled the money laundering. Dubai is a duty-free port and gold bullion landing strip where US Naval vessels often berth. Suitcases full of cash often show up at branches of British and US mega-banks that preside over this unregulated offshore banking haven. The Financial Action Task Force, a conglomeration of Treasury officials from 29 nations which was formed after the 911 tragedy, concluded that money laundering was rife in Dubai. The Taliban had accounts at the Dubai Islamic Bank, whose chairman is Mohammed Khalfan bin Karbash. bin Karbash is Minister for Financial & Industrial Affairs in the UAE government. Al Qaeda operatives often used the howala banking house known as Al Barakaat, whose global headquarters is in the UAE. Al Barakaat was founded by Somali warlord Ahmed Nur Ali Jim’ale and serves as a quasi-central bank in Somalia. In November 2001 the US cut off Al Barakaat’s channels to international money center banks, effectively wiping out the savings of middle class Somalis who kept their money at Al Barakaat. [252] Just before the September 11, 2001 terror attacks on America, a wave of gold couriers began showing up in Dubai with massive amounts of bullion taken from Afghanistan. The gold belonged to Al Qaeda and the Taliban and was most likely derived from opium smuggling. In Dubai the couriers exchanged their gold for the US dollars they needed to pull off the coming attacks on the US. Alleged hijacker ringleader Mohammed Atta received $120,000 to plan and carry out the terror attacks from accounts in Dubai controlled by operation paymaster Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi on orders from Pakistan’s ISI Chief Mahmud Ahmad. Another alleged hijacker and al-Hawsawi himself used accounts at the Dubai branch of the British Cecil Rhodes-founded Standard Chartered Bank to finance the 911 operation. According to the June 19, 2007 Financial Times, the government of Dubai now owns a 2.7% stake in Standard Chartered via its Istithmar Corporation, which recently paid $100 million to Cunards for the QE2 luxury liner.
Henderson, Dean. Big Oil & Their Bankers In the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror Network (p. 43). Dean Henderson. Kindle Edition.
In an October 11, 2003 national radio address, President Bush enunciated the more grandiose ambitions of his handlers when he stated, “The new Iraqi dinar will highlight the country’s crown heritage…in this ancient region which founded modern banking”. In November 2003 Bush appointed Carlyle Group partner James Baker to forgive Iraq’s debt- now Eight Families debts.
Henderson, Dean. Big Oil & Their Bankers In the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror Network (pp. 358-359). Dean Henderson. Kindle Edition.
“I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority.” – George W Bush, March 13, 2002.
Robinson, Charlie. The Octopus of Global Control (p. 55). Kindle Edition.
"I truly am not that concerned about Osama bin Laden." - George W. Bush
Robinson, Charlie. The Octopus of Global Control (p. 55). Kindle Edition.
“Who knows if he’s hiding in some cave or not. We haven’t heard from him in a long time. The idea of focusing on one person really indicates to me people don’t understand the scope of the mission. Terror is bigger than one person. He’s just a person who’s been marginalized. I don’t know where he is. I really just don’t spend that much time on him, to be honest with you.” – George W. Bush
Robinson, Charlie. The Octopus of Global Control (p. 55). Kindle Edition.
"Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be here somewhere. Nope, no weapons over there. Maybe under here?" – George W. Bush
Robinson, Charlie. The Octopus of Global Control (p. 55). Kindle Edition.
“Money trumps peace sometimes.” – George W. Bush, 2007.
Robinson, Charlie. The Octopus of Global Control (p. 53). Kindle Edition.
Few fields of academic research are surrounded by so many misunderstandings and misconceptions as the study of Western esotericism.
Citizenship and Education in Liberal-Democratic Societies: Teaching for Cosmopolitan Values and Collective Identities
The Origins of the Federal Reserve
The financial elites of this country, notably the Morgan, Rockefeller, and Kuhn, Loeb interests, were responsible for putting through the Federal Reserve System, as a governmentally created and sanctioned cartel device to enable the nation’s banks to inflate the money supply in a coordinated fashion, without suffering quick retribution from depositors or note holders demanding cash. Recent researchers, however, have also highlighted the vital supporting role of the growing number of technocratic experts and academics, who were happy to lend the patina of their allegedly scientific expertise to the elite’s drive for a central bank. To achieve a regime of big government and government control, power elites cannot achieve their goal of privilege through statism without the vital legitimizing support of the supposedly disinterested experts and the professoriat. To achieve the Leviathan State, interests seeking special privilege, and intellectuals offering scholarship and ideology, must work hand in hand.
In 2002, Ben Bernanke, then a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, acknowledged publicly what economists have long believed. The Federal Reserve’s mistakes contributed to the “worst economic disaster in American history” (Bernanke 2002).
Today the Rothschild’s control a far-flung financial empire, which includes majority stakes in most world central banks. The Edmond de Rothschild clan owns the Banque Privee SA in Lugano, Switzerland and the Rothschild Bank AG of Zurich. The family of Jacob Lord Rothschild owns the powerful Rothschild Italia in Milan. They are members of the exclusive Club of the Isles, which provides capital for George Soros’ Quantum Fund NV, which made a killing in 1998-1999 destroying the currencies of Thailand, Indonesia and Russia. Soros was a major shareholder at Harken Energy. Quantum NV handles $11-14 billion in assets and operates from the Dutch island of Curacao, in the shadow of massive Royal Dutch/Shell and Exxon Mobil refineries. Curacao was recently cited by an OECD Task Force on Money Laundering as a major drug money laundering nation. The Club of Isles group which funds Quantum is led by the Rothschilds and includes Queen Elizabeth II and other wealthy European aristocrats and Black Nobility. Fugitive Swiss financier and Mossad cutout Marc Rich, whose business interests were recently taken over by the Russian mafia Alfa Group, is also part of the Soros network. [849]
Henderson, Dean. Big Oil & Their Bankers In the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror Network (p. 309). Dean Henderson. Kindle Edition.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/george-soros-army-of-lieutenants-get-easy-access-to-biden-white-house/
President Jose Lopez Portillo had nationalized Mexico’s banking system in 1982, citing the international bankers’ betrayal of Mexico through encouragement of flight capital from the Mexican elite. Lopez Portillo stated that the IMF remedy was to “deprive the patient of food”.
Henderson, Dean. Big Oil & Their Bankers In the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror Network (p. 244). Dean Henderson. Kindle Edition.
As Naylor points out, IOS’ early successes were made possible by US-led economic policies. On the one hand, the status of the dollar as a reserve currency had opened up the nascent eurodollar markets and created the need for dollar recycling. IOS fit nicely into each. On the other hand, there was the IMF’s encouragement for developing countries to loosen controls on capital flows. The flight of capital from these countries often saw that capital going right into investments in the United States and Europe, as well as into other developing zones. The IMF’s policies often created a business boom, though not necessarily in the countries it was professing to help, and Cornfeld capitalized on these and related policies to turn IOS and its web of mutual funds into a veritable sponge for soaking up all of this now-available capital. IOS salesmen and couriers descended on developing countries, criss-crossed war zones, and forged alliances with dictators, offering investment opportunities and access to bank accounts in Luxembourg, Geneva, and the Bahamas.
Alyse, Whitney. One Nation Under Blackmail - Vol. 1 (pp. 346-347). Trine Day. Kindle Edition.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB) had close ties to BCCI. The CDB was founded by David Rockefeller’s International Basic Economy Corporation which launched the Caribbean Basin Initiative. CDB loans money to countries that agree to allow multinational corporations to set up tax-free operations within their borders to take advantage of cheap labor. These areas become known as export processing zones and give the corporations additional tax benefits from the US government. The IMF came out of the Bretton Woods financial agreement signed after WWII and was officially founded in 1973. The IMF serves as gatekeeper for the World Bank and the giant international money center banks which fall under its umbrella. The IMF serves as judge and jury in ordering Third World countries to privatize their economies. and in imposing harsh austerity measures which hit the poorest people the hardest. These measures include raising electricity rates, imposing a value-added tax or ending government subsidies for basic foodstuffs such as rice and beans. If the country in question follows IMF mandates it continues to receive loans from the World Bank crowd. If it does not, the country is cut off, its currency devalued and its economy ravaged by hyperinflation. BCCI played scam artist for the IMF bankers. The IMF helped BCCI set up shop in numerous countries, including virtually every Latin American nation. BCCI loaned the Jamaican government money to pay the IMF in return for Jamaican government deposits at BCCI. Bolivia got BCCI loans under the same agreement, this time at the urging of the World Bank. In Peru, the IMF/World Bank solicited Peruvian Treasury deposits for BCCI None of these countries would ever see the over $1 billion in Treasury funds which they collectively put down the black hole called BCCI. Peru later indicted a former IMF/World bank official for his role in the fleecing of Peru’s Central Bank. While recycled petrodollars were being pumped into BCCI from the pockets of GCC oil sheiks, and drug profits were derived from contra cocaine and mujahadeen heroin, BCCI was simultaneously swindling the central banks of some of the world’s poorest countries with a wink and a nod from the IMF and World Bank. As Alexander Cockburn put it in a Wall Street Journal column, when BCCI was closed by the Bank of England in July 1991, “The little guys went to the wall and the big fish swam off with the swag”. The racket worked something like this. BCCI, in addition to providing loans for deposits, would offer to broker a country’s debt with the IMF if the central bank was willing to deposit funds at BCCI’s local branch. Those countries that cooperated with the IMF would be rewarded with more loans. Those that refused never saw their money again. Most of the $20 billion that disappeared when BCCI was shut down belonged to Third World central banks whose governments had not bent over far enough for the IMF. This outright theft left the poorest, most debt-ridden countries in the world even more impoverished. African nations were hardest hit. Cameroon, where US AID had been BCCI’s biggest customer, lost one-third of its hard currency reserves. Nigeria lost $300 million when BCCI crony Alhaji Ibrahim Dasuki bribed central bankers, then split with the cash. For his troubles he was appointed Sultan of Sokoto, the Muslim capital of northern Nigeria. The central banks of Zambia, Zimbabwe, Congo, Ivory Coast, Sierre Leone, Gabon, Senegal and Ghana were all pilfered by BCCI. [230] All failed to satisfy IMF mandates for new loans or were in arrears on old debt. BCCI sponged over $2 billion from the African continent. Even in England, where $400 million was lost by depositors when BCCI closed shop, most of the money belonged to African immigrants of marginal means who believed BCCI’s claim of being “a bank for the world’s poor”.
Henderson, Dean. Big Oil & Their Bankers In the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror Network . Dean Henderson. Kindle Edition.
Russia's economic crisis of summer 1998 has renewed debate as to whether the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has helped, hindered or been irrelevant to economic transition in the core of the former Soviet Union. We examine the relationship between the Fund and Russia over the past ten years, highlighting a mixed record of successes, failures and the limits of the Fund's role. We argue that the institution may well also have inadvertently facilitated the rise of political forces which are today opposed to the second phase of reforms which Russia so desperately needs. Our conclusions question whether the IMF ought to continue to lead Western attempts to foster stability and growth in Russia.
Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO
The evidence indicates that when French intelligence became aware of the Libyan initiative to create a currency to compete with the Western central banking system, the decision to subvert the plan through military means began, ultimately including the NATO alliance.
The NATO overthrow was not for the protection of the people, but instead it was to thwart Gaddafi’s attempt to create a gold-backed African currency to compete with the Western central banking monopoly.
The final and definite account of the Cold War will never be written, as history evolves together with the societies that produce and consume history. But a consensus has emerged among scientists in numerous countries that the most prominent feature of the Cold War, as seen from the West, was the fight against Communism on a global scale. In this struggle that characterised the history of the twentieth century like few other features the former superpower of the world, Great Britain, lost its leading position to the United States. The latter used its struggle against Communism to increase its power decade after decade. And after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the end of the Cold War, the Empire of the United States dominated the world like no other Empire before in history.
Ganser, Daniele. NATO's Secret Armies (Contemporary Security Studies) (p. 38). Taylor and Francis. Kindle Edition.
Not long ago, a chocolate oligarch and his fascist gendarmes seized Ukraine’s fertile wheat and barley fields, whilst Credit Suisse-funded Islamist rebels took Mosul & the adjacent Kirkuk oilfield – one of the world’s largest – for Exxon Mobil. BRICS nations saw imperial over-reach and, led by Putin, busied themselves preparing for the slow-motion unraveling of the Anglo-American financial empire.
Henderson, Dean. Nephilim Crown 5G Apocalypse (p. 81). Kindle Edition.
Events in Ukraine and the Middle East have exposed the desperate position of the Rockefeller/Rothschild energy oligopoly. Putin has just begun playing his extremely good hand of cards. The GCC puppets remain embattled and circling the wagons. The end of the petroleum standard can only be staved off by permanent war. Strange days indeed.
Henderson, Dean. Nephilim Crown 5G Apocalypse (p. 135). Kindle Edition.
In 2014 the US led a coup that displaced a “democratically elected” president, Viktor Yanukovych.
When Trump ran for president, he scandalized the foreign policy establishment by speaking against the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the military alliance that was set up after the Second World War and had expanded to thirty European and North American countries.36 He kept the rhetoric up throughout the 2016 campaign, saying on July 20, 2016, in an interview with the New York Times at the Republican National Convention, “If we cannot be properly reimbursed for the tremendous cost of our military protecting other countries, and in many cases the countries I’m talking about are extremely rich… we have many NATO members that aren’t paying their bills.”37 Now, at the State of the Union, Trump drew attention to the efforts he had made in getting NATO members to live up to their commitments. “We are also getting our allies, finally, to help pay their fair share,” he bragged. “I have raised contributions from other NATO members by more than $400 billion, and the number of Allies meeting their minimum obligations has more than doubled.”
Hemingway, Mollie Ziegler. Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections (pp. 57-58). Regnery Publishing. Kindle Edition.
Executive Summary
Monetary Policy Reform
• Establishes three types of United States currency: standard silver coin, standard gold coin and treasury credit-notes (restores Constitutional currency)
• The United States Treasury buys and cancels all outstanding capital stock of the former Federal Reserve Banks
• The privately owned Federal Reserve System becomes a public entity, the United States Treasury Reserve System
• A new Board of Governors of the Treasury Reserve System uses a specific law-mandated plan to maintain and stabilize the exchange value of the currency
Section 5. Reformation Of The Federal Reserve System
(A) The Federal Reserve Act of 1913, as amended, is hereby further amended, as per its provisions for the dissolution of and recovery of assets of the Federal Reserve System.
(B) Administration of the Federal Reserve System is hereby vested in the United States Treasury in a new department of the Treasury, hereby established and called the United States Treasury Reserve System or by the short title of Treasury Reserve System.
(C) A Board of Governors of the Treasury Reserve System is hereby established and charged with the administration of the Treasury Reserve System, to exercise all powers and duties granted within the provisions of this Act and those powers and duties, some of which are subject to modifications by this Act, previously specifically granted to the Board of Governors and to the Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve System. This Board will consist of thirteen officers including a Director of the Board plus one Governor of the Board from each of the existing twelve Federal Reserve Bank Districts, hereafter called United States Treasury Reserve Districts.
(1) All officers of the Board of Governors of the Treasury Reserve System will be appointed by the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the Senate, the initial selection of all thirteen officers commencing with the passage of this Act and following the guidelines set forth herein. Selection shall be made without discrimination because of race, creed, color, sex, or national origin. No individual who is or has been a Senator or Representative in Congress shall be an officer of the Board of Governors of the Treasury Reserve System.
(2) The officer who serves as Director of the Board of Governors of the Treasury Reserve System:
(a) shall be a United States citizen; and,
(b) shall be selected from the nation at large; and,
(c) shall be a person of tested banking or economic experience; and,
(d) shall receive a salary equivalent in amount to the salary of a member of the United States Senate; and,
(e) shall maintain an office within the District of Columbia; and,
(f) shall have no specific term of office, being replaced at the pleasure of the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the Senate.
(3) Each officer who serves as a Governor on the Board of Governors of the Treasury Reserve System:
(a) shall be a United States citizen; and,
(b) shall have been a resident for at least two years of the Treasury Reserve District which they represent; and,
(c) shall be actively engaged in their Treasury Reserve District in commerce, agriculture, the
medical arts, education, industry, services, or consumer or labor affairs; and,
(d) shall not at the time of their selection, nor at any time during that period of service, be or have been an officer, director, employee, or a direct stockholder of any bank; and,
(e) shall not have held State elected or appointed office; and,
(f) shall not be an Officer of the Court, a Member of the American Bar Association, nor a
practicing Attorney; and,
(g) shall maintain an office within the Treasury Reserve District which they represent; and,
(h) shall receive a salary equivalent to the salary of a member of the United States House of
Representatives; and,
(i) shall, on good behavior, serve a minimum term of four years, being replaceable at the pleasure of the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the Senate except that, after initial selection of all thirteen officers, no more than four of the twelve Governors may be replaced in any one four-year period or in any one presidential term of office.
(4) A Lieutenant Governor will be selected for each of the twelve Treasury Reserve District Offices in the same manner and under the same guidelines as are Governors except that, after the initial selection, more than four new selections for that office are permitted in any one presidential term when the purpose of each additional selection is to fill an office which becomes vacant. Each Lieutenant Governor—
(a) shall receive a salary equivalent in amount to 85 percent of the salary of a member of the United States House of Representatives; and,
(b) shall assume the powers, responsibilities, duties and salary of the Office of the Treasury
Reserve District Governor upon the resignation or during any period of incapacity of the
Governor of the District or in the event that the holder of that office is convicted of a felony.
(5) All officers of the Board of Governors of the Treasury Reserve System will receive their written Delegations of Authority from and be sworn into office by the Secretary of the Treasury.
(6) All officers of the Board of Governors of the Treasury Reserve System are hereby charged to administer the affairs of the nation’s monetary system with the sole purpose of maintaining a long term, stable exchange value for United States Treasury credit-notes.
(a) All actions undertaken by the Board will require an affirmative vote, recorded as part of the public record in the District of Columbia Office of the Director of the Board of Governors, by nine of the thirteen officers.
(b) The officers need not be physically present in order to cast their vote.
(D) A Treasury Reserve Account which will be administered at the sole discretion of the Board of Governors of the Treasury Reserve System is hereby established.
(E) The Federal Open Market Committee of the existing Federal Reserve System is hereby abolished, its powers and responsibilities being transferred to the Board of Governors of the Treasury Reserve System.
(F) All rights, titles, properties, interests, and every claim of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, of all Federal Reserve Banks, of all member banks, of all Federal Reserve agents, and of all individuals, in and upon the Federal Reserve System is hereby transferred to and vested in the United States Government to be held in and administered by the United States Treasury under the Treasury Reserve System.
The Fed will finance a special purpose vehicle (SPV) for each acronym to conduct these operations. The Treasury, using the Exchange Stabilization Fund, will make an equity investment in each SPV and be in a “first loss” position. What does this mean? In essence, the Treasury, not the Fed, is buying all these securities and backstopping of loans; the Fed is acting as banker and providing financing. The Fed hired BlackRock Inc. to purchase these securities and handle the administration of the SPVs on behalf of the owner, the Treasury. In other words, the federal government is nationalizing large swaths of the financial markets. The Fed is providing the money to do it. BlackRock will be doing the trades. This scheme essentially merges the Fed and Treasury into one organization. So, meet your new Fed chairman, Donald J. Trump.
According to another video that has recently been circulated by American Intelligence Media, Google started out at DARPA as Mimix. This name is particularly creepy because the more people use the same Google search engine the more they seem to become mimics of the DARPA programmers, creating a sort of hive mind group-think which DARPA called “birds of a feather”.
Henderson, Dean. Nephilim Crown 5G Apocalypse (p. 8). Kindle Edition.
Let’s go back to when the internet was founded. In the heady rush of the 1970s, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), whose mission is to develop emerging technologies for national security purposes, linked a number of supercomputers together to transfer huge amounts of data. The National Science Foundation eventually took over this project, which led to the creation of university networks, which then developed into the scaffolding of the modern internet. Therefore, DARPA has always had an outsized role in developing and exploiting the internet for its own uses. They did this by funding a variety of cutting-edge research projects. Google was the result of one of those DARPA grants. The NSA and DARPA jointly funded a grant awarded to Larry Page and Sergey Brin. The goal was to chart how “birds of a feather flock together online” through search engine aggregation. Based on that research, these two individuals cofounded Google just a year later. Shortly thereafter, the company became a military contractor and was able to obtain rights to what is now known as “Google Maps” by purchasing CIA satellite software. From the outset, Google has always had a cozy relationship with our national security apparatus.
Malone MD MS, Robert W. PsyWar: Enforcing the New World Order (pp. 38-39). Skyhorse. Kindle Edition.
"Google is destroying the most glorious gift humanity was granted in the last 300 years [the internet]. The future under Google is a fascist dystopia, their way or the highway, no room for dissidents, no room for free speech. Google is a boot stomping on your face for eternity. Google is the deep state. Forget about conventional wars, forget about spies, forget about intelligence agencies, forget about all of that. It's all about the internet and Google running the internet. They decide how you feel, what you think, what information you can and can't look at, and ultimately who does and doesn't have a voice."
David Bowie's final message written weeks before he died, 2015
HORSFIELD, JOHN. World order - Who rules who? (pp. 285-286). Hearts Minds Media. Kindle Edition.
It appears that David Rockefeller’s social credit-based “China model” powered by DARPA-funded Google's Dragonfly software and OpenPower Foundation is leading to way towards global enslavement one block and chain at a time.
Henderson, Dean. Nephilim Crown 5G Apocalypse (p. 230). Kindle Edition.
Covid
“Europe’s nations should be guided towards the Super-State without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.” – Jean Monnet, “Founding Father” of the EU, April 30, 1952
Robinson, Charlie. The Octopus of Global Control (p. 72). Kindle Edition.
The Enlightenment Scheme
In 1773, Mayer Amschel Rothschild instructed Adam Weishaupt to set up an organization in America that would facilitate the transformation of the hundreds of sovereign nations into a one world government. The plan was put in motion in 1776, some 250 years ago, with the understanding that this transformation would not happen overnight. The objectives of Rothschild and Weishaupt were clear and concise.
Use violence and terrorism rather than academic discussions
Preach “Liberalism” to usurp political power
Initiate class warfare
Politicians must be cunning and deceptive – any moral code leaves a politician vulnerable
Dismantle “existing forces of order and regulation. Reconstruct all existing institutions
Remain invisible until the very moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning or force can undermine it
Use Mob Psychology to control the masses. Without absolute despotism, one cannot rule efficiently
Advocate the use of alcoholic liquors, drugs, moral corruption and all forms of vice, used systematically by “agenteurs” to corrupt the youth
Seize properties by any means to secure submission and sovereignty
Foment wars and control the peace conferences so that neither of the combatant’s gains territory placing them further in debt and therefore into our power
Choose candidates for public office who will be servile and obedient to our commands, so they may be readily used as pawns in our game
Use the Press for propaganda to control all outlets of public information, while remaining in the shadows, clear of blame
Make the masses believe they had been the prey of criminals. Then restore order to appear as the saviors
Create financial panics
Use hunger to control to subjugate the masses
Infiltrate Freemasonry to take advantage of the Grand Orient Lodges to cloak the true nature of their work in philanthropy. Spread their atheistic-materialistic ideology amongst the “Goyim” (gentiles)
When the hour strikes for our sovereign lord of the entire World to be crowned, their influence will banish everything that might stand in his way
Use systematic deception, high-sounding phrases and popular slogans, the opposite of what has been promised can always be done afterward, that is of no consequence
A Reign of Terror is the most economical way to bring about speedy subjection
Masquerade as political, financial and economic advisers to carry out our mandates with diplomacy and without fear of exposing “the secret power behind national and international affairs
Ultimate world government is the goal
It will be necessary to establish huge monopolies, so even the largest fortunes of the Goyim will depend on us to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with the credit of their governments on the day after the great political smash
Use economic warfare, rob the “Goyim” of their landed properties and industries with a combination of high taxes and unfair competition
Make the “Goyim” destroy each other so there will only be the proletariat left in the world, with a few millionaires devoted to our cause, and sufficient police and soldiers to protect our interest
Call it The New Order; appoint a dictator
Fool, bemuse and corrupt the younger members of society by teaching them theories and principles we know to be false
Twist national and international laws into contradiction which first masks the law and afterward hides it all together, substitute arbitration for law
Robinson, Charlie. The Octopus of Global Control (pp. 72-73). Kindle Edition.
That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system’s fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
I quote the profound statement made by the prophet Hosea, which is found in the Christian Bible: "My people perish for lack of knowledge." Some may already have heard my expose of the foreign aid scandal, in which work I named several conspiratorial organizations, whose number is legion. Their final objective was the overthrow of the U.S. Constitution and the merging of this country, chosen by God as HIS country, with a godless One World-New World Order Government which will return the world to conditions far worse than existed in the Dark Ages.
The name, New World Order, is seen as something developed as a consequence of the Gulf War in 1991, whereas the One World Government is recognized as being centuries old. The New World Order is not new, it has been around and developing under one or another guise for a very long time but it is perceived as a DEVELOPMENT OF THE FUTURE, which is not the case; the New World Order is PAST AND PRESENT. That is why I said earlier that the term One World Government is, or ought to be, preferred. Aurellio Peccei once confided in his close friend Alexander Haig that he felt like "Adam Weishaupt reincarnated." Peccei had much of Weishaupt's brilliant ability to organize and control the Illuminati of today, and it showed through in Peccei's control of NATO and formulating its policies on a global scale.
One question this book examines is whether there is any truth in the age-old lore of the conspiracy theory of history — are we are dealing with a multi-generational, necromantic, synarchistic phenomenon? Have secret societies created a national security state apparatus to beguile us hoi polloi of our economic, civic and spiritual integrity? Do these secret societies create and play both sides in controlled conflicts to produce outcomes to further their New World Order millenniumist designs?
Millegan, Kris. Fleshing Out Skull & Bones: Investigations into America's Most Powerful Secret Society . Independent Publishers Group. Kindle Edition.
“Let us openly assert, that there is operating in the world today, and especially within our own nation, a conspiracy that is either a direct descendant of the Illuminati of 1776 or something closely patterned after it.”88
Millegan, Kris. Fleshing Out Skull & Bones: Investigations into America's Most Powerful Secret Society . Independent Publishers Group. Kindle Edition.
The Bavarian Government outlawed the society and in 1787 published the details of The Illuminati conspiracy in The Original Writings of the Order and Sect of the Illuminati. In Adam Weishaupt’s own words: By this plan, we shall direct all mankind in this manner. And, by the simplest means, we shall set all in motion and in flames. The occupations must be so allotted and contrived that we may, in secret, influence all political transactions. There is disagreement among scholars as to whether or not the Illuminati survived its banishment. Nevertheless, the group had been quite successful in attracting members and had allied itself with the extensive Masonic networks. The Illuminati was publicly founded May 1, 1776, at the University of Ingolstadt by Weishaupt, Professor of Canon Law. It was a very “learned” society; Weishaupt drew the earliest members of his new order from among his students. On December 5, 1776, students at William and Mary College founded a secret society, Phi Beta Kappa. A second chapter was formed, at Yale, in 1780. The anti-Masonic movement in the United States during the 1820s held groups such as Phi Beta Kappa in a bad light. Because of pressure, the society went public. This is noted by some researchers as the direct cause of the appearance of Yale’s Order of Skull and Bones.
Millegan, Kris. Fleshing Out Skull & Bones: Investigations into America's Most Powerful Secret Society . Independent Publishers Group. Kindle Edition.
The flag of Washington’s District of Columbia has three red stars. One for each city state in the three city empire. This corporate empire of three city states controls the world economically through London’s inner city, militarily through the District of Columbia, and spiritually through the Vatican.
The Common Law. COMPENDIUM FACTUM IURIS: Book of Lawful Facts. Legalitarianally Instrumented Declarative Statutory/positions/arguments/locus standi/statement/disposition.
The year was 1871. The US was going through a lot of turmoil: the nation was bankrupt and vulnerable after the Civil War, and the London bankers, which included the notorious Rothschild family, were ready to make a deal with Congress to remedy that turmoil. These bankers made a tremendous amount of credit available in the aftermath of the Civil War as a means to fight Lincoln's Greenback after he was killed, with some theorizing that part of the motivation for Lincoln’s assassination came from his push to privatize the monetary system. The second reason why the bankers made so much credit available was to collect interest from those who desperately needed the money, which would’ve been the United States government at the time. Usury and debt slavery is a practice as old as time. Well, as old as Mystery Babylon. Not much has changed since the days of Mystery Babylon, not the usury, not the debt slavery, not even the iconography and symbolism. Capitol of the United States, Washington, D.C, 1865 Passed by Congress, the Act of 1871 provided a government for the 10-mile parcel of land known as the District of Columbia, allowing Washington, D.C. to act as a corporation outside of the original constitution of the United States. [1] Why does the Washington, D.C. constitution have nothing to do with the United States constitution? Why exactly is Washington, D.C. totally separate from the rest of the United States? Why does it NEED to be separate from the United States, as a separate territory at the epicenter of the Virgin Mary, tucked right in between Virginia and Maryland? The Act of 1871 changed our country's founding fathers’ original wording and capitalization of the Constitution from "Constitution for the United States for America" to "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". A mixture impactful phrasing, and capitalization may mean nothing to the average person upon initial inspection, but these subtle changes are a huge deal in the realm of legislation. Compounded with these minor changes was clever marketing of the act to unify the territorial government for the entire District of Columbia. The aforementioned are contributing factors as to how such a major act flew under the radar, ultimately overturning the United States Constitutional Republic. Since 1871, the Federal government has usurped nearly all the power that was formerly held in the hands of the people. How on earth was Congress able to pass a separate constitution and incorporate the United States? It’s simple really: a corporation, by definition, is a legal entity separate from its owners, and its most notable feature? The legal benefit of a corporate structure is that a “corporation protects its owners from personal liability for corporate debts and obligations.”[2] Is it possible we have been living under the UNITED STATES CORPORATION, instead of the United States of America (the country), all this time, owned by international bankers and the aristocracy of Europe and Britain, without our knowledge or explicit informed consent?
Reallygraceful, Grace.
THE DEEP STATE ENCYCLOPEDIA : Exposing the Cabal's Playbook (pp. 16-18). Reallygraceful. Kindle Edition.
The final and definite account of the Cold War will never be written, as history evolves together with the societies that produce and consume history. But a consensus has emerged among scientists in numerous countries that the most prominent feature of the Cold War, as seen from the West, was the fight against Communism on a global scale. In this struggle that characterised the history of the twentieth century like few other features the former superpower of the world, Great Britain, lost its leading position to the United States. The latter used its struggle against Communism to increase its power decade after decade. And after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the end of the Cold War, the Empire of the United States dominated the world like no other Empire before in history.
Ganser, Daniele. NATO's Secret Armies (Contemporary Security Studies) (p. 38). Taylor and Francis. Kindle Edition.
Sean takes great care to describe how the British Empire silently transformed from control of territory to more illusory stratagems for gaining total control of the planet’s resources (both natural and human), such as using the cloak of corporate personhood to create multinational corporations which quietly usurp control of governments around the world. This plan then led to the origin of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund as well as the United Nations to set up the framework – or skeleton – for ‘world government’ (a.k.a. globalism). Also worth mentioning is the under-current of the Anglo-American Establishment which was launched after World War II through NATO; often it is called “Operation Gladio,” but that’s really just the codename for the Italian branch of the operation, which nonetheless has become a slang term for all of the secret armies and operations (around the world) created by Winston Churchill and MI6 and maintained by the CIA throughout the cold war. Initiated in 1940, Gladio was not admitted publicly until fifty years later; even then, recognition of such a top-secret endeavor was begrudgingly tolerated when the Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti revealed it to the world on October 24, 1990. Operation Gladio is often credited with the assassination of Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro in 1978 (via the Red Brigades), so Andreotti was courageous for making this useful disclosure.
Stone, Sean; Grove, Richard; Preparata, Guido. New World Order . Trine Day. Kindle Edition.
By 1930 it was clear that Western Civilization was again in an Age of Conflict; by 1942 a semiperipheral state, Germany, had conquered much of the core of the civilization. That effort was defeated by calling into the fray a peripheral state (the United States) and another, outside civilization (the Soviet society). It is not yet clear whether Western Civilization will continue along the path marked by so many earlier civilizations, or whether it will be able to reorganize itself sufficiently to enter upon a new, fourth, Age of Expansion. If the former occurs, this Age of Conflict will undoubtedly continue with the fourfold characteristics of class struggle, war, irrationality, and declining progress. In this case, we shall undoubtedly get a Universal Empire in which the United States will rule most of Western Civilization. This will be followed, as in other civilizations, by a period of decay and ultimately, as the civilization grows weaker, by invasions and the total destruction of Western culture. On the other hand, if Western Civilization is able to reorganize itself and enters upon a fourth Age of Expansion, the ability of Western Civilization to survive and go on to increasing prosperity and power will be bright. Leaving aside this hypothetical future, it would appear thus that Western Civilization, in approximately fifteen hundred years, has passed through eight periods, thus:
1. Mixture, 350-700 2. Gestation, 700-970 3A. First Expansion, 970-1270 4A. First Conflict, 1270-1440
Core Empire: England, 1420 3B. Second Expansion, 1440-1690 4B. Second Conflict, 1690-1819
Core Empire: France 1810– 3C. Third Expansion, 1770-1929– 4C. Third Conflict, 1893–
Core Empire: Germany, 1942 The two possibilities which lie in the future can be listed as follows: Reorganization Continuation of the Process 3D. Fourth Expansion, 1944- 5. Universal Empire (The United States) . 6. Decay . 7. Invasion (end of civilization)
Quigley, Carroll. Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time (pp. 25-26). GSG & Associates Publishers. Kindle Edition.
"It is not possible to neglect the role of the Jews in either the settlement, or the Revolution, of the United States of America. As Sombart has remarked "what we call Americanism is nothing else.than the Jewish spirit distilled."74 One cannot be too sure whether the expression of Sombart would not be closer to reality if it assumed a reverse posture to the effect that the Jewish spirit is nothing else than the Americanism distilled."
Populist founding fathers led by John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Thomas Paine - none of whom were Masons - wanted to completely severe ties with the British Crown, but were overruled by the Masonic faction led by Washington, Hamilton and Grand Master of the St. Andrews Lodge in Boston General Joseph Warren, who wanted to “defy Parliament but remain loyal to the Crown”. [24] St. Andrews Lodge was the hub of New World Masonry and began issuing Knights Templar Degrees in 1769. All US Masonic lodges are to this day warranted by the British Crown.
Henderson, Dean. The Federal Reserve Cartel (p. 10). Dean Henderson. Kindle Edition.
In 1789 Alexander Hamilton became the first Treasury Secretary of the United States. Hamilton was one of many founding fathers who were Freemasons. He had close relations with the Rothschild family which owns the Bank of England and leads the European Freemason movement. George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, Ethan Allen, Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, John Brown and Roger Sherman were all Masons. Roger Livingston helped Sherman and Franklin write the Declaration of Independence. He gave George Washington his oaths of office while he was Grand Master of the New York Grand Lodge of Freemasons. Washington himself was Grand Master of the Virginia Lodge. Of the General Officers in the Revolutionary Army, thirty-three were Masons. [23] This was highly symbolic since 33rd Degree Masons are said to be Illuminated.
Henderson, Dean. The Federal Reserve Cartel Dean Henderson. Kindle Edition.
BIS is owned by the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, Bank of Italy, Bank of Canada, Swiss National Bank, Nederlandsche Bank, Bundesbank and Bank of France. Historian Carroll Quigley says BIS was part of a plan, “to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole...to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements.”
Henderson, Dean. The Federal Reserve Cartel (p. 6). Dean Henderson. Kindle Edition.
In 1946, the British Crown’s Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) convened a meeting with the US Office of Strategic Services (OSS) at which the group launched Operation Ultra. With confiscated German & Japanese gold, the group launched a series of banks to fund future black operations. The remainder of the looted gold ended up in the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland. The BIS is the central bank for central bankers and would commandeer the new Bretton Woods global monetary system which was established in 1944 and features the official global South looters known as the IMF and the World Bank. OSS Chief William “Wild Bill” Donovan was handled by Sir William “Intrepid” Stephenson, the real-life 007 on which SIS veteran Ian Fleming’s James Bond movies are based. As detailed in my book Big Oil & Their Bankers...
“The ‘affirmative task’ before us is to create a New World Order.” – Joe Biden, former Vice President, United States of America.
Robinson, Charlie. The Octopus of Global Control (p. 68). Kindle Edition.
The Illuminati: Subverting the Body Politic Why this attack against our body politic? In 1785, a courier died en route to Paris from Frankfort-on-the-Main. A tract written by Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati, Original Shift in Days of Illuminations, was recovered from the dead messenger, containing the secret society’s long-range plan for “The New World Order through world revolution.” Adam Weishaupt The Bavarian Government outlawed the society and in 1787 published the details of The Illuminati conspiracy in The Original Writings of the Order and Sect of the Illuminati. In Adam Weishaupt’s own words: By this plan, we shall direct all mankind in this manner. And, by the simplest means, we shall set all in motion and in flames. The occupations must be so allotted and contrived that we may, in secret, influence all political transactions. There is disagreement among scholars as to whether or not the Illuminati survived its banishment. Nevertheless, the group had been quite successful in attracting members and had allied itself with the extensive Masonic networks. The Illuminati was publicly founded May 1, 1776, at the University of Ingolstadt by Weishaupt, Professor of Canon Law. It was a very “learned” society; Weishaupt drew the earliest members of his new order from among his students. On December 5, 1776, students at William and Mary College founded a secret society, Phi Beta Kappa. A second chapter was formed, at Yale, in 1780. The anti-Masonic movement in the United States during the 1820s held groups such as Phi Beta Kappa in a bad light. Because of pressure, the society went public. This is noted by some researchers as the direct cause of the appearance of Yale’s Order of Skull and Bones. In The Cyclopedia Of Fraternities, a genealogical chart of general Greek-Letter college fraternities in the United States, shows Phi Beta Kappa as “the parent of all the fraternal systems in [American] higher education.” There is only one “side” lineal descendant: the Yale chapter of 1780. The line then continues to Skull and Bones in 1832, and on through the other “only at Yale” senior societies, Scroll & Key and Wolf’s Head. Phi Beta Kappa is the “first three Greek letters, for ‘Philosophia Biou Kubernetes’ or ‘Love of wisdom, the helmsman of life’.” A skull homophone is scull, a quick, gliding boat and part of Skull & Bones first nomenclature. John Robison, a professor of natural philosophy at Edinburgh University in Scotland and a member of a Freemason Lodge, said that he was asked to join the Illuminati. After study, he concluded the purposes of the Illuminati were not for him. In 1798, he published a book called Proofs Of A Conspiracy: An association has been formed for the express purpose of rooting out all the religious establishments and overturning all the existing governments … the leaders would rule the World with uncontrollable power, while all the rest would be employed as tools of the ambition of their unknown superiors. Proofs Of A Conspiracy was sent to George Washington. Responding to the sender of the book with a letter, the president said he was aware the Illuminati were in America. He felt that the Illuminati had diabolical tenets and that their object was a separation of the People from their government. In Proofs Of A Conspiracy, Robison described the ceremony of initiation of the “Regent degree” in Illuminism. In it “a skeleton is pointed out to him [the initiate], at the feet of which are laid a crown and a sword. He is asked ‘whether that is the skeleton of a king, nobleman or a beggar.’ As he cannot decide, the president of the meeting says to him, ‘The character of being a man is the only one that is importance.’” This is, essentially, the same as the writing in the Skull & Bones’ Temple: “Wer war der Thor, wer Weiser, Bettler oder Kaiser? Ob Arm, ob Reich, im Tode gleich.” Which reads: ““Who was the fool, who the wise man, beggar or king? Whether poor or rich, all’s the same in death.”
Millegan, Kris. Fleshing Out Skull & Bones: Investigations into America's Most Powerful Secret Society . Independent Publishers Group. Kindle Edition.
“For the first time in its history, Western Civilization is in danger of being destroyed internally by a corrupt, criminal ruling cabal which is centered around the Rockefeller interests, which include elements from the Morgan, Brown, Rothschild, Du Pont, Harriman, Kuhn-Loeb, and other groupings as well. This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth.” – Carroll Quigley, Historian.
Robinson, Charlie. The Octopus of Global Control (pp. 71-72). Kindle Edition.
“The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence co-operative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”
Quigley, Carroll. Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time (p. 6). GSG & Associates Publishers. Kindle Edition.
Thus, the Illuminati employ Triads, Trilaterals and Trinities to create a society ruled by the few elite Sangreal bloodlines presiding over the masses, which is represented by the pyramid. When the Brotherhood of the Snake occupied the Grand Lodge of Cairo they worshiped a trinity of Isis, Osiris, and Horus, who were Nephilim offspring. The Brotherhood spread the concept of trinity to the Christian (Father, Son and Holy Spirit), Hindu (Brahma, Shiva and Krishna), and Buddhist (Buddha, Dharma and Sangha) faiths. The eye atop the pyramid depicted on the $1 bill is the all-seeing eye of the Afghan Roshaniya, known alternately as The Order, and the Order of the Quest – names later adopted by Skull and Bones, Germanenorden, and the JASON Society. It symbolizes the Nephilim Watchers, who keep on eye over humanity. It also symbolized the coming 5G surveillance state. Novus Ordo Seclorum appears beneath the pyramid, while Annuit Coeptis appears above the all-seeing eye. Annuit Coeptis means “may he smile upon our endeavors (Great Work of Ages)”. Above the eagle on the right side of the note are the words E Pluribus Unum, Latin for “out of many one”. The eagle clutches 13 arrows and 13 olive branches while 13 stars appear above the eagle’s head. America was founded with 13 “colonies”. Templar pirate Jacques de Molay was executed on Friday the 13th. The number represents the 13 bloodlines of the Nephilim Crown. The numbers 3, 9, 13, and 33 are significant to the secret societies. The Bilderberger Group has a powerful Policy Committee of 13 members. It is one of 3 committees of 13 that answered to founder Prince Bernhard – a member of the Hapsburg family and leader of the Black Nobility until his death. The Bilderberg Policy Committee answers to a Rothschild Round Table of 9.
Henderson, Dean. Nephilim Crown 5G Apocalypse (p. 127). Kindle Edition.
"The dark horse of the New World Order is not Communism, Socialism or Fascism. It is Technocracy.
Although this radical movement lost momentum by 1940, it regained status when it was conceptually adopted by the elitist Trilateral Commission (co-founded by Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller) in 1973 to be become its so-called "New International Economic Order."
The Trilateral Commission was co-founded by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1973 with the stated purpose of creating a New International Economic Order (NIEO)
Advocacy journalism is journalism that advocates a cause or expresses a viewpoint with a specific agenda. It is often designed to increase or decrease the Overton window. It is a form of propaganda.
Malone MD MS, Robert W. PsyWar: Enforcing the New World Order (p. 480). Skyhorse. Kindle Edition.
More properly called propaganda, “advocacy journalism” is a perversion of more traditional journalistic ethics that advocates the adoption of a nonobjective viewpoint, usually to advance some social or political cause.
Malone MD MS, Robert W. PsyWar: Enforcing the New World Order (p. 48). Skyhorse. Kindle Edition.
First-generation warfare refers to ancient and post-classical battles fought with massed manpower, using phalanx, line, and column tactics with uniformed soldiers governed by the state. . . .
Second-generation warfare refers to industrial warfare, which evolved after the invention of the rifled musket and breech-loading weapons and continued through the development of the machine gun and indirect fire. . . .
Third-generation warfare focuses on using late modern technology-derived tactics of leveraging speed, stealth, and surprise to bypass the enemy’s lines and collapse their forces from the rear. Essentially, this was the end of linear warfare on a tactical level, with units seeking not simply to meet each other face-to-face but to outmaneuver each other to gain the greatest advantage.
Fourth-generation warfare as presented by Lind et al. is characterized by a post-modern return to decentralized forms of warfare, blurring of the lines between war and politics, combatants, and civilians due to states’ loss of their near-monopoly on combat forces, returning to modes of conflict common in pre-modern times.
Fifth-generation warfare is conducted primarily through non-kinetic military action, such as social engineering, misinformation, and cyberattacks, along with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and fully autonomous systems. Fifth-generation warfare has been described by Daniel Abbot as a war of “information and perception.”
Malone MD MS, Robert W. PsyWar: Enforcing the New World Order (pp. 142-143). Skyhorse. Kindle Edition.
Cognitive warfare involves a different approach than more classical fifth-generation warfare strategies and tactics. Cognitive warfare is specifically focused on targeting your subconscious mind.
Malone MD MS, Robert W. PsyWar: Enforcing the New World Order (p. 143). Skyhorse. Kindle Edition.
The document adapted a church covenant to a civil situation and was the basis of the colony’s government.
One area where Puritan ministers were unquestionably an
authority was the legal system. The influence of the English
legal tradition was unquestionable, but the laws had to conform
to Biblical principles, and in many cases were based on the
Old Testament (including, for example, the legal foundations of
slavery, justified by Biblical quotations) (Colonial Laws, 1889, p.
52; Wiecek, 1977). Naturally, the ministers often had to evaluate
the legislation from a Biblical perspective. However, once the law
was considered sufficiently “godly,” it was passed by the general
court which was not subordinate to the church, and was carried
out by civil authorities, even if it concerned religious matters
[like witchcraft cases, as in the infamous case of Salem (Norton,
2002)].
The relations between the church and the public in general
in New England were also different from the English model. New
England congregations chose their own ministers, which changed
the power dynamics. In England, the Church was an extension
of the state, an instrument of controlling the population. In
catholic countries the Church was not subject to state power,
but was a separate political actor, largely independent from
the public as well. In New England, religious authorities were
chosen by the public. While ministers could find themselves in
conflict with their parishioners on some issues, such situations
rarely lasted long—a minister the congregation was unhappy
with was dismissed and replaced with another, more agreeable
one. A minister’s livelihood depended on the support of their
congregation. Ministers were rarely able to dedicate enough time
Frontiers in Political Science | www.frontiersin.org 6 March 2022 | Volume 4 | Article 804673
Aleksandrov Accountability in Early New England
to provide for themselves and were dependent on the salary
the congregation paid them and on donations (Holifield, 1993;
Demos, 2000, p. 8; Norton, 2002, p. 16–18, 124). Consequently,
in dealing with secular authorities the ministers were likely to
act as a conduit for public opinion. The church organization, the
religious authority, was as much an extension of the congregation
as the elected officials.
The relatively equitable politics of New England depended primarily on one crucial factor—social cohesion, a relative equality of status supported by a communal ideology.
On the other hand, New Englanders were not exactly rich. Even the wealthiest colonists would be considered well-off, but not exceptionally wealthy in England. This was partly a consequence of the dominant ideology, which stressed the importance of community and saw an overabundance of individual wealth as suspect. What New England colonists strived for was “competency”—the ability to provide a decent living to oneself and one's family and to contribute to the community, but no more than that. Accumulating more wealth than competency required was seen as suspect at best and downright immoral at worst. Most colonists intentionally chose farm work or crafts, seen as honest labor, instead of potentially more profitable ventures, specifically because they did not want to jeopardize their moral and religious wellbeing in favor of material gains
IN THE NAME OF GOD, AMEN. We, whose names are underwritten, the Loyal Subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, &c. Having undertaken for the Glory of God, and Advancement of the Christian Faith, and the Honour of our King and Country, a Voyage to plant the first Colony in the northern Parts of Virginia; Do by these Presents, solemnly and mutually, in the Presence of God and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil Body Politick, for our better Ordering and Preservation, and Furtherance of the Ends aforesaid: And by Virtue hereof do enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal Laws, Ordinances, Acts, Constitutions, and Offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general Good of the Colony; unto which we promise all due Submission and Obedience. IN WITNESS whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names at Cape-Cod the eleventh of November, in the Reign of our Sovereign Lord King James, of England, France, and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth, Anno Domini; 1620.[16]
